IRSHAD NABI QURESHI versus GENERAL MANAGER, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS
The Section 9 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), the Section 2A & 4 Promotion Intelligence Super Session Appellant was considered for promotion in the year 2000, but this was the case for the required increase of its AC from 1996 to 1998. The delay was made and two people were juniors. It was promoted by the fact that the appellant was subsequently promoted and it was pointed out that in his AC from 1996 to 1998, 1998 There were no negative entries. In the case of postponement, his next juniors were to be considered for development. Promotion was separate from security and it was perfectly unfair and unfair to lose appellant's promotion with his juniors. Appellant should be allowed to develop from the day his juniors were promoted to the principle of the following principle. Was.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
