ATTAR KHAN versus STATE
Section 11 alleged that the complainant had filed a petition at the police station alleging that the complainant had accompanied his grandfather's daughter to Inina Zina Bill Jaber. What happened when the investigating complainant was found innocent and was dismissed by the magistrate in the matter. The complainant then filed a private complaint against the accused in which the accused was convicted under Section 11 of the Kazf (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 and the sessions court imposed a fine of Rs 10,000 on the affected persons for six months. Was sentenced. After the trial court sentenced the accused, he was released on bail because he was old. Appealing to the accused is subject to appeal while he repents on bail in federal law court. There was a court and the father of the girl whom the accused alleged that his grandfather committed fornication. Jaber along with his accused, who was less than 100 years of age four years, made the charges against him. And apologized to the open court even to the father of the girl and promised to apologize to the complainant. Upon his return to the village, the accused voluntarily fined Rs 2,500 for the complainant, as his sincere repentant son received money in the complainant's court signal to accept his apology. Not having to insist on the execution of the sentence meant solving the problem once more, and it was another form of alternative dispute resolution in the wider peace of the village where the parties were living.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from FR Tank / DI Khan lawyer