Find a Lawyer

UMAR GUL versus STATE

Section 302 (b) Code of Criminal Procedure (V 1898), Section 512 Testimony of witnesses, who later appeared as prosecution witnesses, will be examined in connection with the previous examination, but in the present case the prosecution The witnesses were presented earlier and are not available in the subsequent proceedings for which no compelling reason was given by the prosecution's witnesses under Section 121212 (1), CRPC not accepted or accepted. This can be done because the accused did not have the opportunity to inspect them. And it was helpful in his defense facts that the complainant intentionally delayed reporting of the murder and his son and grandson could not be allowed to escape the law when both the accused were arrested and faced. ? At trial, the complainant took a U-turn and came out with different versions from his state in the FIR and under section 121212, the CCP complainant was selected to be a defense witness and his defense as a witness. The witness completely denied his statement under Section 121212, CRPC and FIR in which he accused his son of murdering his wife. The accused himself did not support the defeating, contradictory, contradictory and false, tangible evidence and is liable to be denied, the absence of the witnesses investigating under Section 512, later in the regular case C.C. Prosecution can raise suspicion in a prosecution case unless it is worth hearing. family advocate from Shorkot lawyer