ABID MAHMOOD versus STATE
Definition of Section 302 (b) / 377/511 evidence The statement of the prosecution's witness shows that the accused's case was framed by the prosecution and that he was an employee of the mosque committee in which the deceased's father was Was he the president who had a dispute with members of the Tablighi party, he was fired by the committee, since then, the members of the committee became enemies and he did not even talk to them. Until the date of the arrest there was a contradiction. The prosecutor's witness was an illiterate person with no witnesses and no public and high social status to influence the police, and the accused strained his relationship with the prosecutor's witness, and this was understandable. She would use the accused to surrender to the police authorities and take her to the police station to protect her from physical harassment by the PO who allegedly made a personal search of Rs 70 and a sheet on the arrest of the accused. The accused allegedly exported to the police and then the accused allegedly led the police party. In lakyt and was a chain of recovery, FIR about the money and other miscellaneous articles had nothing. In the complainant's second statement it was maintained that no seed pendant was presented to any private person to whom the recovery witness was made and that the case was not sealed because according to the investigating officer the prosecution Failure to present two material witnesses, for which there was no comprehension, was presented by the prosecutor as evidence of extra-judicial confession and it was last seen that his
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Alipur lawyer