Find a Lawyer

SAEED ALIAS GULDANG versus STATE

Section 392 Definition of Evidence The benefit of the doubt was not given by the trial court in its decision regarding the basic components of the robbery as per section 90 90 by, the PPC Complainant did not, at the time of filing the crime report In his statement before the police, and even when appearing before the trial court, either the alleged element of prevention, the fear of death or the robbery of the accused by the police, the gas cylinder and the immediate injury against the currency. Appeared, was not presented to the court and the complainant was not identified even after the complainant did not confirm the claim of theft and returned Was either suspected of theft by itself in the course of the purchase receipt or by presenting evidence that he sold it, and the factor of strength, obstruction or injury is not available on record, safely on an unknown decision. It cannot be relied on that the evidence of the alleged robbery victim was contradictory and destructive. In the prosecution case, the prosecution's case was suspicious and the accused was acquitted on the benefit of the doubt. top civil advocates from Chak Sheza lawyer