Find a Lawyer

ARSHAD ALI KHAN versus S. M. ISMAIL

A. XXXVII, RR 2 and 3 Suit for Receipt of Money Based on Unclaimed Check, Plaintiff's Request was that the PAF could not negotiate an agreement between the parties to the establishment of a fuel station on the plot because the PAF had agreed to the defendant. Refused to lease the site to. ; Of the amount promised to pay compensation to the plaintiff, the defendant issued a check to him, which was insulted in the petitioner's request for leave, claiming that I did not have a claim here. Where neither cause of action has been proven, nor. The check was issued and no bank was located. That the plaintiff's case against the defendant was pending pending, where the check was issued and the bank was located. And the plaintiff received the check from the defendant under the compulsion with the help of the designated officers of PAF. During the trial, the defendant discharged the defendant for the conditional defense of the bank guarantee. The defendant had raised a questionable defense or showed a credible question of law. And the fact that the trial case was not valid in approving an unlawful order. ask a advocate free from Noorpur nooranga lawyer