Find a Lawyer

JAHANZAIB versus MALIK MEHBOOB

Article 150 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 7 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 201, 109, 197, 167, 193 and 149 of the evidence of an admissible witness were before the trial court. Under which the case was moved, the trial court acted on the complainant's lawyer's request and declared one of the prosecutor's witnesses as admissible, allowing the complainant's lawyer to be examined, the lawyer said. It is understood for whom he is presenting his statement and if he speaks in a different voice, the court will have to decide in what voice he speaks the truth. Article 150 of the testimony 1984 allowed arbitrary authority if a witness contradicted his statement or tried to suppress the fact, the person, who called the witness to ask him any question, The cross can be put to a party by the party. The RT had the discretion to allow the party summoning the witness to question him, as it could be cross-examined, which was the only way to determine the truth under the law if any witness of the prosecution was unexpected As one who did not agree. For the prosecution, the court could not refuse to allow the prosecutor to cross-examine, the witness said it was not necessary that after cross-examination, the witness would lose his credibility, but his evidence could depend on either party and the court. Can come. His own conclusion, even after going through all the evidence, the evidence of a hostile witness could not be completely defamed, and only because of this was he called a contempt trial because the prosecution's witness was convicted. immigration advocate from Rangoo lawyer