Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAFI KHAN versus MST. SHABANA IRFAN

Section 12 (2) Against fraud and misrepresentation, the applicant and the defendant entered into a contract of sale under which the applicant had to buy a piece of land along with the incomplete bungalow at incom M at but without consideration. The defendant received some money in the house. I said that in connection with the said house, a separate General Power of Attorney was also executed by the petitioner / vendor in favor of the defendant on the basis of the price of the said house and thus the said house. The amount including the amount of was treated as payment for a portion of the land purchased by the applicant, by in Maca located in exec In pursuit of a general power of attorney executed in favor of the respondents said that the defendant was selling agreement with any party in this regard. The petitioner of the aforesaid party, while receiving the amount of the house and the said house, filed a petition against both under section 12 (2), CPC. The NT and the other party that rejected the request reinforce the controversial order raised by the applicant's lawyer and, on the contrary, the other party has held that the attorney is usually required by the petition. The reference was made without any agreement. Selling and considering a legally appointed lawyer / defendant were serious questions of law and fact that could not be decided without a record of the evidence; in the circumstances of the case, the lower court, Committed while giving the trial court the opportunity of leading evidence to pass the injunction on the grounds of the case and to prove their own material evidence to the two parties. immigration advocates from Mustang lawyer