MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE versus DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, OKARA
Sections 2 (h) (ii), Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 199 and 212 (2) Terms of Service and Terms of Service of Appeal Retired Government Employee Sentencing Appeal Approved by Service Tribunal Scope Petitioner Approved by Authority A retired government employee challenged the order to impose the recovery notice as well as recovery penalty, the Punjab employees were suffering from employment under a final order under the Disposal and Accountability Act 2006, the legal status of the service tribunal. Only one person in government service or who was a member of the civil service of the province or who held a civil office in relation to the affairs of the province or an employee serving in any court or tribunal Aggrieved by the order, the service tribunal may prefer appeal as a petitioner. Retired person / employee of the Appeal was not appreciated, therefore there was no remedy for the appeal. The provisions of the Punjab Employees Act were not applicable to the applicability of the ICICI Discipline and Accountability Act, 2006. Beyond the law, exercising a jurisdiction which they do not have by law, the High Court may regulate the proceedings of an administration, or the executive officer may, by a reasonable injunction, go beyond the law, Use is not permitted due to its adoption by law or improperly Denied or exercised any jurisdiction, or where the law under which he acted prescribed the manner in which he acted, the orders and notices of abrogation of law
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
