Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD KHAN RANJHA versus SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, LAHORE

Maintaining Arts 199 and 212 Constitution Petitions Civil Terms of Service and Terms of Service High Court's jurisdiction The permanent applicants were claimed to suffer from the promotion of junior colleague's claim that the improper order of promotion was fair, rules and benches. Allegation and responsibility are lucrative. For the resolution of the terms and conditions of service, the Service Tribunal had exclusive jurisdiction and the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court could not be considered as an order of jurisdiction, even without the jurisdiction or its jurisdiction. Couldn't get that option either. The High Court has the jurisdiction to act on a matter relating to the jurisdiction of the Constitution contained in Article 212 of the Constitution and the Service Tribunal has full jurisdiction to intervene in such matters. The Constitution Petition was rejected.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014

• MUJADDAD ASHRAF v. COMMISSIONER LAHORE DIVISION, LAHORE 2014 CLC 230
• The BANK OF PUNJAB v. ZEPHYR TEXTILE LIMITED through Chief Executive Officer 2014 MLD 233
• Mst. NOORAN BIBI alias BANO v. State 2014 PCrLJ 237
• UTILITY STORES CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN (LTD.) v. UNI-CARE INTERNATIONAL COSMETICS, MULTAN 2014 CLC 238
• NAVEED v. State 2014 PCrLJ 250
• Mst. RAFIQUE BIBI v. MUHAMMAD ARSHAD 2014 MLD 251
• MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE v. DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, OKARA 2014 PLC(CS) 253
• NISAR AKBAR KHAN v. JAMAL NASIR KHAN 2014 CLC 254

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2014 →

family advocate from Darya Khan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes