MUHAMMAD YOUNAS versus PUNJAB LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, LAHORE
Sections 2 (xxx), 41 and 54 (3) West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Section 2 (i) and Section O12 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Application for Termination of Salesman Scope Petitioner was terminated from employment while serving as Agriculture Field Officer (AFO) at the bank, filed a complaint before the Labor Court, responding to the Labor Court's decision. The appeal filed by the payer was accepted by the Labor Appellate Tribunal. The court was set aside by the Labor Appellate Tribunal that the complaint filed by the applicant is not practicable because he is not an employee. The applicant's position was that the Labor Appellate Tribunal failed to meet the arguments and conclusions filed by the Labor Court as a laborer. And it is not appropriate to improperly mention the legitimate circular duties in the sales of the applicant as the applicant, as a field field officer, has indicated that he / she is in line with the line management of the employee's bank status as an employee. Or otherwise have to be determined in relation to his duties rather than his position. If the duties of an employee are primarily involved, then the maulavi or manual work shall be deemed to be that of the applicant. The duties of the applicant were not primarily scholarly or manual work Agricultural loan Plaintiff / Bank applicant's recommendations Were approved to achieve the applicant's duty distribution goals which they will fulfill. Manage Petition For Agricultural Loans By Petitioning A Petitioner is actually a salesman
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
