UTILITY STORES CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN (LTD.) versus UNI-CARE INTERNATIONAL COSMETICS, MULTAN
The jurisdiction council for the defendants for specific performance of the contract under Section 12 Arbitration Act (X40 of 1940), section 34 Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), O XV, R 1 suit, section 34, Arbitration Act, 1940 Write your statement. The plaintiff's claim and proceedings were postponed for the filing of a written statement, but before filing a written statement, the defendants submitted an application for the establishment of proceedings pursuant to an arbitration clause under section 34 of the Arbitration Act 1940 and this petition The case was filed after submitting the response. The arguments were settled and instead of passing the order on the petition, the defendants were prosecuted against the former party and the petition was moved to halt the trial. The plaintiff's claim that the plaintiff's own product was related to the display and purchase was before the trial court's claim that the defendant's claim was recognized and there was no reason left, and in this case, The provisions of AXV, R1, CPC will come into force and the court can deal with it. The trial court adjourned the filing of a written statement to present the case when the plaintiff's trial was controversial in the trial case. In the main case, the trial court should have decided the fate of the respondent's application under section 34 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, section 34 of 1940, if it should have been filed immediately and if thereafter This case was registered. Taking other measures may result in dismissal of such scores and the trial court was not obliged to exclude the plea by default when the same decision was rendered.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
