Find a Lawyer

KHAS TEXTILE MILLS versus MUHAMMAD ABBAS

Section O10B Payment Act (IV of 1936), Section 15 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Group Insurance, entitled Respondents, whose right wing was enforced during employment / duty. Claimed to be compensated. Unable to perform his duties, the insurance applicant / employer acknowledged the defendant as a laborer and also acknowledged the incident in which the respondent's hand was laid, but claimed that Defendant does not deserve group insurance because it was not permanent. Employees became permanent, after completing their three-month completion period, according to the rules applicable to the applicant establishment, the employees themselves admitted in their request that the respondent was a permanent worker working in the capacity of Doffer. 3 3 2004 No element of suspicion remains as defendant in the sense of being a permanent worker within the meaning of Section O10 of the B of Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 while respondent was a permanent employee, While he was performing his duty with the applicant, he suffered severe injuries during that time, the group insured. Deemed the ransom as claimed by the court below. In the event of any unlawful interference or absence of any court order issued below, the respondents were declared entitled to insurance, a constitutional application against this order was dismissed. online advocate from Jehangira lawyer