Find a Lawyer

RIAZ HUSSAIN versus TEVTA THROUGH CHAIRMAN, LAHORE

Article 199 Constitutional Appeal The writ petitioner's directive urges the High Court to give the impression that the respondent authority considers its constitutional petition as representational and decides it according to law. Neither an Appeal / Review / Review / Request or Representation petitioner was filed nor is it pending before the Respondents and any such action will certainly be restricted to some extent, among other complications. , Respondents must, in any direction, circumstance or exercise their jurisdiction, reject the constitutional petition of such authority / court or tribunal \ r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014

• Dr. MANZOOR AHMAD v. GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Secretary Agriculture, Lahore 2014 PLC(CS) 15
• ABDUL HAMEED v. DISTRICT CO-ORDINATION OFFICER, MULTAN 2014 MLD 16
• Dr. KIRAN QADIR v. Maj. Dr. MUHAMMAD ALI YOUSAF KHAN 2014 PLD 17
• SAEED AHMAD v. MUHAMMAD SHOAIB KHAN 2014 PLD 22
• FATIMA SUGAR MILLS LTD. 2014 CLD 26
• KHUSHI MUHAMMAD v. MUHAMMAD ASHFAQ 2014 PLD 26
• Lt. Commander (Retired) NAEEM JAVED v. UNIVERSITY OF THE PUNJAB through Vice-Chancellor, Lahore 2014 PLC(CS) 29
• Mst. SAIMA BIBI v. RAHEEL BUTT 2014 MLD 38

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2014 →

immigration advocates phone number from Blitang lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes