DR. KIRAN QADIR versus MAJ. DR. MUHAMMAD ALI YOUSAF KHAN
Section 5, Schedule, and 14 (b) of the Gardens and Wards Act (VII of 1890), Sections 12, 25 and 47 (c) of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 for the Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 (2), Provisions. The Internet Court appealed the Appeal Court to the Family Court under section 25 of the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890, for the custody of the minor son. Denying the custody of the minor's father, the order issued by the District Judge and the High Court, respectively, was the mother's request that the intra-court appeal is competent because no appeal against the order passed by the Guardian Judge was made under the section of the Guardians and Wards Act 1890. 47 was not provided for. And it can be disregarded for purposes of restoring an intra-court appeal to disqualify an appeal filed under section 14 (b) of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964. The ruling on the rights of women, in the present case presented by the Family Court, was enforceable. And then the mother's appeal filed under section 14 (b) of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act 1964 was dismissed by the District Judge, where the constitutional petition filed by her was also dismissed by the High Court. The pass was the right of appeal under section 47 and as the Wards Act, 1890, the father's request was for the custody of the minor's mother, which could not be allowed to blow hot and cold in the same breath as the High Court did not allow. Intra-court appeal dismissed from \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
