Find a Lawyer

SAEED AHMAD versus MUHAMMAD SHOAIB KHAN

0 XVII, R 13 The lawyer / lawyer's non-submission was denied the right to proof of the plaintiff / defendant The appeal filed by the plaintiff / defendant was also dismissed by the appellate court nor the plaintiff / defendant appeared in the court. Nor was the evidence closed on the date the plaintiff's order was presented when the trial court should have provided the defendants with another opportunity to present their evidence, yet the trial court did The evidence was sealed with confession. Neither the defendant / the plaintiff nor his lawyer was present in the court, the orders of the trial court and the appellate court were set aside, the trial court was instructed to give the defendants an opportunity to include their evidence. To which the revision request was allowed

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014

• MUHAMMAD TAHIR v. State 2014 YLR 15
• Dr. MANZOOR AHMAD v. GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Secretary Agriculture, Lahore 2014 PLC(CS) 15
• ABDUL HAMEED v. DISTRICT CO-ORDINATION OFFICER, MULTAN 2014 MLD 16
• Dr. KIRAN QADIR v. Maj. Dr. MUHAMMAD ALI YOUSAF KHAN 2014 PLD 17
• RIAZ HUSSAIN v. TEVTA through Chairman, Lahore 2014 CLC 25
• FATIMA SUGAR MILLS LTD. 2014 CLD 26
• KHUSHI MUHAMMAD v. MUHAMMAD ASHFAQ 2014 PLD 26
• Lt. Commander (Retired) NAEEM JAVED v. UNIVERSITY OF THE PUNJAB through Vice-Chancellor, Lahore 2014 PLC(CS) 29

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2014 →

online advocate from Upper Dir lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes