Find a Lawyer

UMER versus STATE

The testimony of Section 2 302 (b) of the evidence was fraught with contradictions on several points, especially in the event of animosity between the parties, the complainant and the witnesses exaggerated their evidence while the undesirable ones were incident. Despite being present at the site, interested persons were selected as witnesses, the trial court sentenced the accused illegally, and on the basis of the same evidence, the accused was acquitted on the basis of acquittal. Prosecutor's case defective defects, legal weakness, based on temperament I was met with material irregularities. The weak motive set forth by the prosecution could not be proved. The verdict was vague, arbitrary and fake and was recorded without careful and proper consideration of the relevant facts and circumstances. The benefit is that without any reservation, the accused faced a problem. He was acquitted inheritance advocates near Piplan lawyer