Find a Lawyer

NAVEED HAIDER versus NOMAN ABID CO. LIMITED

A. XXXVII, RR1 & 2 Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 Unconditional Leave Receipt Based on Unknown Check The plaintiff has raised Rs 21 million on the basis of dishonest check issued by the defendant. The defendant filed a business relationship with the plaintiff, who was a stock broker, and the defendant was handling the defendant's account for the purchase of the shares under his instructions, and the defendant purchased the shares on behalf of the defendant. In order to consider the shares issued by Ali, a single High Court judge of the High Court has to pay a sum of Rs. 21 million by the dishonest defendant. Ante was granted leave to defend the case on the basis of the supply that, in lieu of the dishonest check, the pay he ordered to pay to the plaintiff, even though the hearing under the question was dishonored. Yes, the order of the same amount was issued in respect of the amount related to the dishonest check or it is under some other consideration will be answered only after the recording of the evidence after the conclusion that the defendant is competent The defense was defense; he became entitled to an unconditional leave to defend the amended order of the suit division bench of the High Court to the extent approved by the single judge of the High Court. Intra-court appeal allowed for unconditional leave entitlement to defend dirt \ r \ n immigration advocates email from Tibba Sultanpur lawyer