Find a Lawyer

SAIN BAKHSH versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 324, 353, 399, 402, 148 and 149 bail, further inquiries of the State Council grant that there was no difference in the alleged party's firing to the police party No one was hurt. During the exchange of shootings between the accused and the police party, weapons / ammunition and ammunition were allegedly recovered from the accused and the investigating officer did not send the recovered blanks to the ballistic expert but arrested and recovered the suspects. All the advisers were policemen. The accused had succeeded in making a further investigation in his favor under the provisions of section 497 (2). The CCP accused was released on bail.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2009

• LIGHT INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. through Chief Executive v. ZSK STICKMASCHINEN GmbH through Attorney 2009 CLC 1113
• BANGLADESH BIMAN CORPORATION v. HAMIDUL ISLAM 2009 YLR 1117
• UMER v. State 2009 PCrLJ 1119
• PFIZER LABORATORIES LIMITED v. PARKE, DAVIS & COMPANY LIMITED 2009 CLD 1120
• NAVEED HAIDER v. NOMAN ABID CO. LIMITED 2009 CLC 1123
• Mst. SHAHEEN BEGUM v. ZAKAULLAH KHAN GHOURI 2009 MLD 1124
• STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN, KARACHI v. VICTOR RESTAURANT through Partners and others 2009 YLR 1124
• COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, PORT MUHAMMAD BIN QASIM, KARACHI v. MIA CORPORATION (PVT.) LTD., ISLAMABAD 2009 PTD 1127

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2009 →

attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Thul lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes