On the basis of the evidence of evidence based on the evidence of testimony on the basis of Section 13 student molestation and student E-Assad, the defendant did not state that he or she was a lawyer at all. Was appearing on behalf of the other plaintiffs and the plaintiffs' statement was recorded on the statement of one of the plaintiffs on 21-9 2006 while a power of attorney was filed in their favor as well as the counsel of the plaintiffs. The Power of Attorney was exhibited on 30 11 2006 in the statement of. Because the plaintiff's statement was not available on file at the time of his statement, his statement would be considered to the extent that the mere preaching was a personal act and a person would have to prove it by appearing as a witness. Arbitration was not verified in the present case before the court or in particular by the appointment of a lawyer to prove the same student, nor was the postman presented nor was there any record of receipt by the audience. If the notice of the student was not reported or denied by him or his confession was submitted, the receipt of approval was not returned, then the post office could prove to be a service of registered letter from the plaintiff. For the purpose of proving the delivery of notice to the students and sending them by means of a registered post confession, it was not lawful for them to make the malady, but to submit to Aksu Maswi. But Patwari was not offered to prove that the same claimant proved the measles number which is his property belonging to the suit property. Plaintiff's oral claim is an understatement
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
