Article 292 (b) and at e am Qatil Adham, the suspect's benefit of the doubt of the testimony of the evidence was the confession of the accused's lawyer as the police had acquitted the two accused during the two investigations. The acquittal was settled on the basis that the justification dispute was misunderstood because the investigating officer did not assume that it was unacceptable to judge the opinion of the police officer or that the crime was unacceptable. A person cannot be evil merely because of the total delay of the police investigation. Post-mortem examination of the bodies of the deceased persons took about twenty-eight hours to raise the suspicion of the truth of the prosecution's story. Since the delay is an indication of the fact that the delay was made solely to advertise the prosecutor's story and to attend the eyewitness testimony. The complainant and other eyewitnesses who presented the general account of the prosecution were not residents of the premises, they did not give any reasonable explanation for their presence at the relevant time, such persons were witnesses in the circumstances. When it was said that witnesses also made dishonest improvements to their statements, as recorded by the trial court, such dishonest improvements in statements were not worthy of dependence. He was not injured, but suffered injuries when the victim's car collided with a tree at the time of the incident. At the time of the attack, the accused was equipped with 244 bore rifles, but nothing was recovered from the possession of the accused. Charges against the accused present in the murder trial
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
