In the provisions & 42 & Q 54 law testimony (1984 1984 of the ten), Article Su 64 suit sued plaintiff Burden Proof, claiming heirloom to qualify for the declaration of relief without occupation, claiming that he was the legal Heritage is and they were, as well as a suit for litigation. The parties to the legal proceedings were obliged to sue by them. In order to prove relations with the deceased parties it was necessary to present it to the person who filed a lawsuit to stop the sale and that confession was in favor of the defendants. Was accepted when two persons were affected by the transaction, the person who allowed the transaction must have kept the plaintiff sleeping on his rights for more than 23 years. The owner's record was left in possession, the inheritance change was confirmed by the legal heritage and they sold the land in favor of the defendants. Plaintiffs did not pray for P's mere conveyance was conveyed to the defendants under the sales suit for the declaration, was unable to receive relief as a result of any occupation filed by the courts below. The result of reading the bad news and not reading the evidence that was recorded in the affidavit without the absence of evidence. The amendment to prove the relationship was accepted and the case dismissed
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
