MALIK ASAD MAHMOOD versus INSPECTOR GENERAL PRISONS PUNJAB
Punjab Jails Subordinate Staff (Qualification and Discipline) Rules 1982 RR 1082, 1084, 1086 and 1095 (f) Deputy Appellant, Assistant Superintendent of Employment to the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4. Jail, District Jail Attack Transfer to District Jail Rawalpindi While the appellant transfer was in progress, the respondents / inspector general jails issued verbal instructions that the appellant should report to Superintendent Jail Attack for posting in sub jail Attock Fort. , Oral orders sent to Superintendent District Jail Rawalpindi Superintendent. District Jail Attack through a letter but before the letter can reach the Superintendent Jail Attack, the appellant was already discharged and after taking advantage of the joint time, Superintendent Jail Rawalpindi was notified for duty. Who informed him of the later development. However, Superintendent District Joy had given the appellant. Rawalpindi when the appellant notified him of the duty nor did the Superintendent District Jail Attack inform the appellant about the subsequent progress and the exchange order orally. On the one hand, he represented that the appellant was in his power and on the other hand he had ordered the appellant to report for superintendent jail duty. Superintendent Jail Rawalpindi did not allow the appellant to join the District Jail Rawalpindi and proceeded to suspend them and also issued a statement of the allegations and all this was done under his authority and jurisdiction. The Department, if not the whole, was primarily responsible for the whole matter and all
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
