DR. ALI SANA BOKHARI versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB
Section 4 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act 1974, the Treasury Department of the Punjab, letters dated 17 6 1986 and 28 5 1986 the federal government memo dated 26 12 1985 and 8 4 1986 are eligible to obtain the required job related degree under the recruitment allowance, Appellant, an officer qualified for the PC Department (Judicial), for which he obtained a PhD degree in law graduation, \ Saadat Hassan Manton, for his work as a civil judge with no professional qualifications. There was no relationship and it was neither related to the job nor required under it. Recruitment Rules Appellant said that to improve his personal qualification by obtaining a degree and not to improve his professional qualification Government Government is willing to grant eligibility allowance without reference to the employment of civil servants while in judicial cadre. Officers claiming to be expelled from the country then their claim was accepted by the government notification dated 28 5 1986 style with a style that is an extension of the principle of advancing technical staff / professional classifiers. In addition, public servants were told that the notification was for a limited purpose and could not be said to be financed. Regarding the purpose of deciding the claim for qualification allowance. On December 17, 1986, the granting of a qualification allowance also appeared before the author for interpretation which rejected the applicant's claim for qualification allowance. However, the appellant's case was not included in the Department of Finance's notification dd 6 6 6 198 covered and his claim for qualification allowance was considered to be invalid, on the basis of which the relevant memorandums / Was misinterpreted. Circular
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Mandi Bahauddin lawyer