MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus DEPUTY DIRECTOR, FOOD
Punjab Civil Servants (Qualification and Discipline) Rules 1975 R 4 (1) (a) (iv) Appeal to the Government Assistant Food Controller before the Dispensary proceedings of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 Service Tribunal. The appellant was not responsible for the shortage due to the reduction in the value of the empty bags applied because the stock of the bags remained in sole custody of the Fodgreen Inspector, who was also charged and An equal proportion was fined, which shows that despite receiving the bags, the appellant's destination was appellant's Received from, held, could not escape liability, so appeal was good
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law websites from Kotla Jam lawyer