Find a Lawyer

ZAHEER HAIDER versus DEPUTY DIRECTOR, FOOD, FAISALABAD

Punjab Service Tribunals Act 1974 Section 4 Government Charges are facing shortage of more than 47 metric tonnes of wheat in public warehouses, Appellant Food Inspector worked with the notice because appellant said that since the newly constructed stock in the warehouses Are spoiled by moisture and dissatisfaction. Smoke which resulted in chaos and a reduction of 1 percent of the deficit and together with its EO suspect, the Food Green Supervisor Authorized Authority, the appellant and his co-accused decided that the percentage of the loss There was heavy order. Appellant assists the Appellate Authority in writing in the amount of Rs. 10,000 and imposing a balance of 2: 1 on both of them, while his co-accused pays the fine imposed on him, As revealed by the facts on the record. That there is a shortage is easy and it is not a matter of stock loss because there is none. Had requested in writing and offered to pay a heavy weight against it that all matters in the memorandum were acknowledged by the respondents of the appellant's appeal that it was the appeal of the appellant to the appellant. The partner's partner may also be excluded for non-performance of the partner whose reasoning is his partner Could not have been done in the absence of the obligation because the appellant had to decide on either of these two duties that he was interested in getting rid of that responsibility and law firms from Mustang lawyer