Find a Lawyer

REHMAT ALI, A.S.I. versus SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TOBA TEK SINGH

Reverse 5 and 6 of the same allegations against the appellant against the Anti-Corruption Police in the Punjab Police (Discipline and Discipline) Rules, 1975, under the same charges and under inquiry. As a result, action was taken against the department along with the appellant. Sub Inspector has been fined for posting his name from the List of Anti-Corruption Courts after appointing the head constable as head constable, reducing pay equal to three increases and acquitting appellant of corruption charges, Additional Inspector The General Police, representing him at the hearing, promoted him as a Section I and amended the pay reduction penalty for the confiscation of the approved service for two years, the copy of the inquiry report to the appellant and the showcase notice The method was not provided, which has been changed to Inquiry. The immovable order, which was held, was obliged to remove the basis of the departmental revenue g. After washing the imposed fines (by appealing the appellant), there was no reason why the appellant should not have the same Should not be held as if the individual inspector had never been charged with the cancellation of a prosecution from a Section I position. The name coming from the e-list and the two-year approved service were dismissed as invalid in view of the court's decision. The amped orders were set aside, the appellant was directed to act as a sub-inspector. And it has been instructed to restore its name to the list. online advocate from Kohat lawyer