Find a Lawyer

AHMAD DEEN versus ZARAI TARAQIATI BANK LTD.

Sections 3, 9 and 22 Cost of suit funds for bank loan collection, scope suit was claimed in favor of the plaintiff bank and the defendant was harassed by the cost of the funds raised by the banking court. The expiration date of the facility was 7 1 1999, while the last payment was made to the court on 1 1 2008. The banking court properly rejected the bank's claim about the excess markup received after the expiration date of the finance and funded the period under the Ordinance of Section 3 (Finance) of the financial institutions. Cost allowed. , 2001 The High Court refuses to interfere in the decision and the order passed by the Banking Court of Appeal is dropped

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014

• MUHAMMAD ASHRAF v. KASHIF IQBAL through Mst. Fakhar-un-Nisa 2014 MLD 109
• LIAQUAT ALI v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, JHELUM 2014 CLC 112
• AHSAN ULLAH v. ILLAQA MAGISTRATE 2014 YLR 113
• ZULFIQAR ALI v. State 2014 MLD 117
• MUHAMMAD NASEER v. State 2014 PCrLJ 123
• KHAWAR ALI v. State 2014 MLD 124
• MEHMOOD UL HASSAN v. SIKANDAR HAYAT 2014 YLR 125
• MUHAMMAD ASHRAF QADRI v. BANK OF PUNJAB through Chairman 2014 CLD 126

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2014 →

online advocate from Barkhan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes