Sections 497 (XLV of 1860), Sections 337 A (i), 337 A (iii), 337 F (v), 337 L (2), 452, 109 and 34 of the Shuja I Khalifa, Shuja I Hashima, Al-Furqaah Hashima, Other Injury, Domestic Preparation After Injury, Attack or Misdemeanor, Contempt, Joint Intent Guarantee, Approval of Non-Attempt of Trial Within Legal Period The case diary does not show that the trial was delayed The accused was solely responsible. Prosecution witnesses did not appear on different dates and the court had to take stringent steps to obtain their attendance, while on other dates the bar was also on strike, therefore, the defendant was not guilty for delaying the trial. Being detained indefinitely because his life and liberties were involved, however, prosecutors believe that the injured person suffered significant injury to the body, which was confirmed by medical evidence, statements of prosecution witnesses and public opinion. Feedback Snow, but based on such evidence, the accused cannot be convicted because the evidence collected by the police was not legal evidence, nor is it due to the fact that the prosecution's witnesses merely made statements. , Which cannot be equated with legal evidence, the legal statements were those on which the opposing party did a cross-examination to investigate the fact because the trial against the accused could not be reached at the end of the legal period and was frustrated and hardest. There was nothing in the record to convict him, as if he were entitled to an exception. The bail suspect got bail accordingly
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
