Article 5, Schedule Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition for Rehabilitation Allowance and Recovery of Dowry Articles Husband said that his wife came with dowry articles with gold ornaments but in her absence she came The mother was present at the trial, the court pronounced the judgment which was upheld by the appellate court with some amendments and the husband fought to the extent that the gold jewelry was approved, as well as the defendant's mother. The trial court did not appear to prove that the defendant's wife had taken the dowry. The plaintiff's wife needed articles with gold jewelry so that she not only brought the gold jewelry to the plaintiff's husband's house, but also left the same thing at the time of her recovery, which she had failed to prove to the plaintiff's wife. Instead, the plaintiff's maternal uncle of one of the gold jewelery, taking advantage of the defendant's mistake / admission, made a list of articles on the dowry and mentioned the gold jewelry in the same plaintiff's wife with the third marriage with the plaintiff's husband. Had entered and needed to have gold jewelry that had seven towels. Twenty-five silver jewelry with gold jewelry was written on the list of articles on the dowry without any receipt that the appellate court did not record credible reasons, while keeping the family court's decision partial to the constitutional petition. Was accepted, \ r \ n. r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
