Section 497 (2) Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 365 A & 34 kidnapping for ransom or ransom, general intention to guarantee, further investigation grant was actually filed against six accused person and stated that The suspects were assigned a specific role, but the accused was not named in the FIR. The suspect was involved in a lawsuit over the alleged kidnapper's subpoena, which alleged that the accused guarded the place, where the accused There was no indictment of whether the party had hired the kidnapper. The kidnappers were not charged with kidnapping, demanding ransom to 6 accused named in the FIR or receiving a similar role, and the accused did not want any person during the supplementary statement. Inclusion will raise doubts about filing a lawsuit. The trial court is likely to use the newly added facts and the appropriate trial period for the final decision of the trial case regarding the plaintiff's additional statements, and the authenticity of the charges against the accused. Will be determined by the parties after recording the evidence. And by the time the accused's case was covered in section (2) of section 497, the CRPC is one of the inquiries that was allegedly behind bars, requiring no further prosecution for further investigation. The detention of the accused will not be proved indefinitely. The suspect was admitted on bail for any useful reason, in the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
