Section 2 (b (b)) defines the power to take advantage of situations that erode the value of the evidence, to the complainant and the prosecutor of the complaint to the right of the case without any consideration or suggestion. Reportedly, both have sufficiently explained the style and manner of the incident; the location of the casualties, and the weapons used during the incident, were reported. Given that the witnesses are residents of the same area and that their presence at the scene of the incident was natural, eyewitnesses were known to be the accused. The suspect's identity was established in the circumstances, both were subjected to lengthy scrutiny by the defense, but they persisted on all material aspects, and successfully defended prosecutorial questions. Responded, the prosecutor proved the ocular account in an authentic, aggressive manner. Medical evidence of the eye witness account of the encouraging, reliable, reliable, and trustworthy eye was completely in accordance with the ocular account Post-mortem examination. Report on the nature of the injuries, the weapon used by the accused, and the nature of the fire The general account regarding the location of the wounds was fully verified. With the help of 30 bore dead pistols recovered, the accused and the crime cases collected during the course of the investigation were sent to the office of the forensic science laboratory, and in this regard the report triggered by the prosecution established by the prosecution. The accused, in his statement under Section 342, confessed that the CRPC was the accused. With the victim
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
