QURBAN HUSSAIN versus DIRECTOR MILITARY LANDS OF CANTONMENTS
Sections 14 and 30 of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 158 Award Objection Litigation Award, which was 9th 2011, was filed by the arbitrator in the court and on 12-12 2011, the applicant filed an objection to the award. The trial court ruled that the decision of the case was retained by Sandia Arbitration and the same was maintained by the lower appellate court. Validity Petitioner knew of the 2011 2011 award, when he was acquitted on the 219 2011 case. Filed an application for rehabilitation, which specifically mentioned that the award was announced against him and he subsequently applied. It was a year. The plaintiff's amendment, in which the petitioner requested the modification of the plaintiff for the Challenge Award dated 9 2011, both the courts correctly observed that the objections filed by the applicants on 1212 2011, the Limitation Act 1908 The use of the amendment was barred under Article 158 of the KA. The jurisdiction refused to interfere with the concurrent decisions, and the following orders were approved by the two courts because the court did not commit any material misconduct. Disclosure was terminated under the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
