Arts 75, 76 and 77 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O. XXXVII, RR 2 and 3 and O'Lean, R 14 Institutional summary suit was not against the respondent's scope of production of secondary evidence on the interchangeable device. The defendant's request for the preparation of secondary evidence regarding the arbitration decision was accepted by the arbitration defendant through the trial, but the arbitration was the result of the verdict and both parties agreed in favor of each other in the words, invoices and agreements. Was implemented. The statement, receipt and execution of the contract are fully stated in your written statement when the application for the preparation of secondary evidence was moved when such documents were denied by the same plaintiff's owner. So it was to prove that such documents were processed by permission in favor of each other. By the way the defendant applied for a petitioner who said that the document was denied possession of the documents TS must be proved by the basic evidence except that the Articles of Convention evidence (76 (a) and ( c) As stated in, Secondary 1984 Secondary Secondary Secondary evidence can be presented only if the original document is not present if the document is processed during the proof and after that the loss is not proved but the secondary evidence will have no value. The impeachment order did not prejudice anyone and the formation of such documents was helpful to the trial court. The review merely because the image has been deleted.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
