Section 9, Parts I and II, Section B Punjab Consultation Courts Rules, 1982, Rr 15 and 28 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 175 ((2)) Applicant to the Return of the Gifted Land The Applicable Chairman of the Court of Reconciliation On the basis of the promise, it was decided that the defendant had accepted the applicant's claim, which does not indicate from the impugned order that the chairman was entitled to such land before assuming jurisdiction. 00,000 / - It was not necessary to read the deceased that both parties had agreed to the jurisdiction of the Court of Reconciliation that the applicant. There can be no basis for understanding the jurisdiction of the Reconciliation Court in the case of the admission of N's claim. A reconciliation court cannot be formed in the case of respondents' claim, after which a legal decision has been made. The order was obliged to draw, in which the applicant failed. The Product Applicant did not file an application for the District Judge to be illegal and to execute any such decree before the WW Order decision. It had no clear value against the jurisdiction of the respondents. \ r \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
