BASHIR AHMAD versus DISTRICT OFFICER (REVENUE), NAROWAL
Section 11 and O VII, R 11 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 Suite for Declaration of Race Jostata, certify the effect of the dismissal of the formation of matters without rejecting the applicable jurisdiction of a decree approved by a competent court. Done on the basis of According to the law and it was stated that the order was not challenged and the final victory was reached, the competent court had passed a proper logical decree and the inheritance dispute was resolved. Justice was a universal application of the judiciary's theory and was based on the principle of public policy that a case should not be prosecuted for one reason. The second time and the litigation must be abolished. The subsequent trial cannot be considered if it falls under the doctrine of race Judasta, which can be decided at any stage of the proceedings. The lawsuit was filed on oblique motions whose doctrine affected it. The judiciary could not be upset over the same issue which had already been decided, both the courts rejected the judicial decision below. No illegal or material misconduct was committed by the High Court, either arbitrary or irrational or objectionable to interference, under which the revision was excluded.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
