Find a Lawyer

KHADIM HUSSAIN versus MUSHTAQ HUSSAIN

Section 12 (2) Specific Relief Act (Constitution of 1877), Section 12 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition for the Specific Performance of the Contracting Appeal Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs' Applicants for Separation The argument was that the wrong address was mentioned by the plaintiff and the former party decree was obtained through fraud and misrepresentation The application for the separation of the former party decree was simultaneously accepted. Accuracy Respondent could not lead a convincing evidence in support of his claim, the address of the applicant in the plaintiff was not accurate and precise. The partial order was obtained through fraud and misrepresentation. The plaintiff was not identified by the applicant for any misinterpretation and non-reading of the evidence, and it was justified that he was not aware of the decree as he obtained the wrong address mentioning it. At the time the constitutional application was dismissed under the circumstances

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014

• MUHAMMAD YASEEN v. State 2014 PCrLJ 1179
• Mst. KANEEZ BEGUM v. MUHAMMAD ASGHAR 2014 MLD 1179
• KARAMAT NAZIR BHANDARI v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2014 PLC(CS) 1184
• GHULAM ABBAS v. State 2014 PCrLJ 1188
• BASHIR AHMAD v. DISTRICT OFFICER (REVENUE), NAROWAL 2014 MLD 1192
• AUTOTECHNIK (PVT.) LTD. v. Syed ABUZAR BOKHARI 2014 YLR 1199
• Dr. NIAZ AHMAD v. DISTRICT CO-ORDINATION OFFICER 2014 PCrLJ 1201
• MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH v. MUHAMMAD ASLAM 2014 CLC 1205

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2014 →

patent advocate from Liaquat Pur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes