AUTOTECHNIK (PVT.) LTD. versus SYED ABUZAR BOKHARI
XML, R1 Specific Relief Act (of 1877), Declarations of Articles 42 and 54, Suit for Permanent Order and Offer of Accounts, Appointment of Recipient Letter (LOI), Plaintiff Company Claiming to be filed under the importance of, the defendants, who were the founders and shareholders of the company, the plaintiffs involved another company with the unlawful purpose of diversifying into the plaintiff's business and further claim Is that it had a foreign car manufacturer's intention to sell its vehicles in Pakistan, and the defendants had illegally acquired the foreign car manufacturer The plaintiff had begun business with the plaintiff and the request for appointment of the recipient for the defendant company was dismissed by the trial court. The question for the determination of the accuracy was whether a company can pray for the appointment of a recipient for another company, and the plaintiff, while dissatisfied with the court, stated that the plaintiff's letter of intent expired in favor of the company. Was done, and even with the intention of the letter no contract was terminated, and the only offer was the conditions for the appointment of the recipient, therefore, there was no error, and there was no error in the disapproval order, Under the circumstances, the appeal was dismissed
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
