Find a Lawyer

ACRO DEVELOPERS (PVT.) LTD. versus BANK OF PUNJAB THROUGH BRANCH MANAGER

Sections 15 and 19 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908) A. XXXIX, Rr 1 and 2 Mortgage Property Auction The plaintiff sought to withhold the mortgaged property auction because the plaintiff owned the property bank Cannot auction due to. There is nothing in the record to show that the plaintiff was the owner of the plaintiff's plot on record allotment letters in which the plaintiff was not shown as the owner of the said plots. Which confirmed that the plaintiff did not own any plot but claimed interest in the allotment of plots due to damages caused by the failure of the residential project. The plaintiff claimed damages against the housing society and Sued for offering accounts, and even if his prayer was allowed in the suit mentioned above, He will not be eligible for auction plots. In order to prevent the applicants from auctioning the plots, the circumstances have been dismissed.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014

• GHULAM SARWAR KHAN v. TARIQ KHATTAK 2014 MLD 1267
• Mst. FARHANA NAZ v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB 2014 PLC(CS) 1270
• Syed HAROON SULTAN BOKHARI v. Syeda MUBARAK FATIMA 2014 CLC 1270
• MUHAMMAD SHAHID v. State 2014 PCrLJ 1273
• Malik MUNIR AHMED KHAN v. MUHAMMAD IJAZ TAHIR 2014 MLD 1275
• ABDUL RASHEED v. SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF MINORITIES AFFAIRS DIVISION, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN 2014 YLR 1278
• GHULAM YASIN v. State 2014 YLR 1283
• MUHAMMAD IKRAM v. BAHA-UD-DIN ZAKARIYA UNIVERSITY through Vice-Chancellor 2014 MLD 1284

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2014 →

law websites from Dera Ghazi Khan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes