EX SEPOY MUHAMMAD ALAM versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Sections 2 (1) (d) (iii), 59 (4) and 133b (3) of the Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 8 (3) and 199 (1) (3) (5) of the Constitution, confessed and sentenced Applicants by Field General Court Marshal (FGCM) Applicant to obtain copies of FGCM proceedings (ie, copies of investigation reports, court inquiry, summary of evidence with charge sheet, organization) And collective warrants) to provide the applicants with such copies to establish the basis for denial of appeal. Apart from the petitioner, a civilian was a member of the Pakistan Army, therefore, the unanticipated order passed against him was not without jurisdiction or illegal, to personally seduce the civilian applicant army / Involved in terrorist activities, was responsible for prosecuting and dealing with Section 2 (1) (d) (iii) of the Pakistan Army Act under Article 199 (3) of the Constitution. The bar included will also apply to applicant cases. Civilian PE tutoring petitioners were convicted by the FGCM, who allegedly refused to provide them with copies of their proceedings under Article 199 (1) of the Constitution. No writ could be issued against the court or tribunal. Pakistan's Armed Forces for failing to admire the person
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
