STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN versus MST. KAUSAR HUSSAIN
Section 114 Review Insurance Controversy Applicant Insurance Corporation seeks review of the order passed in the constitutional petition filed by the defendant, under which the applicant's insurance corporation is instructed to consider the defendant's complaint / insurance claim. In which the applicant had an intrusive interface, that no claim was filed by the defendant, therefore, the applicant was not in a position to consider the status of the insurance policies because of the validity of the record. It is revealed that the defendants approach the insurance tribunal to resolve their complaint. Yes, but his request was withdrawn and he was instructed to approach the relevant court before the appropriate forum respondents, instead filing a constitutional petition, in which he changed his address. , This fact alone is sufficient to prove that the constitutional application was concealed from the facts and filed by the respondent Respondent, it appears that the way to obtain a judgment arises a new cause for action on their insurance claim. Wanted, only for disappointment the applicant's insurance corporation order was requested to be reviewed. Vastu lenders was approved without listening, and he is entitled to return recalled disabled High Court order allowing the application and review, in conditions
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014