Articles 2 302, 5 365 b, 6 376 and ??? q qatild amd, abduction, abduction or forcing a woman to marry. Appreciating the Evidence The benefit of the doubt was not, at last, presented to the accused in his statement under Section 342, CRPC. Such evidence cannot be used to prosecute the accused, but the trial court illegally, without first knowing the legality, used not only the last seen evidence against the accused, but also stated Even the accused on the piece of evidence, who could not be sustained. The victim's husband was released by the prosecution during the trial and was not presented as a witness. His testimony as a witness, at trial, triggered self-doubt in the story of the prosecuting attorney, failing to substantiate the Chemical Examiner's report that the swabs were stained with semen, Not helpful to the prosecution, the victim was happily living with her husband, and DNA or group mini-tests were very important in this case, which could be largely determined whether the deceased was with the deceased. Why should the accused be held guilty of intercourse only or not, the recovery of the sheet was not helpful to the prosecution. That there was no blood stain, and the chemicals were not sent to the Examiner, Syed Chaddar had no motive articles and was not related to the victim, the prosecution had failed to bring the accused to the house. , The trial court did not justify convicting the accused, while dismissed by interested witnesses unreliable / unlawful.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
