Section 417 (2A) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302 of Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 of the murder case, the appeal against the accused with illegal arms, was acquitted on murder charges. I have been requested to discharge it. Under section 13 of the Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965, on which the request was processed, and the accused was also acquitted of the charge under Section 13 of the Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965, there were justified facts regarding the recovery of the dagger. Syed Khanjar was not recovered from the suspect's possession, but the investigating officer took him into custody in the absence of the accused and the accused was convicted of the murder case. Was given, and under the same FIR, they were also registered with a separate case which also witnessed the recovery. The aforementioned dagger, who was also acquitted against the accused in the murder case, was denied the story of the murder of the victim, and the recovery of the dagger had left both disbelievers and the accused acquitted. Depending on the circumstances in which the accused was acquitted, the recovery of the dagger was not an independent form, but it is involved in the murder case, in which the accused was acquitted, the complainant in filing the appeal within a fixed period. The unsuccessful time limit appeal was also able to be rejected on this score
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
