MUHAMMAD IRFAN versus JUDGE FAMILY COURT, TAUNSA SHARIF
Article 5, Schedule and 11 (3) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Petition The right to inquire into the testimony of the plaintiff for marriage credibility is not mentioned in the affidavit that the defendant's counsel filed the West Pakistan Family Courts Act. , Under section 11 (3) of section 11 of 1964, excluded or denied the examination of witnesses in favor of attendance. Without compelling reasons to exercise discretion against a party, the plaintiff should have been given time to examine the evidence presented by the plaintiff, especially when the plaintiff's council was in attendance at the date of the immovable order that was sustained. Inappropriate order was set aside One of the parties was instructed to appear before the trial court plaintiff and order the witness accordingly \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
