Section 12 Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 2 (e) (h) Specific Performance of Contract Contract Contents The suit defendant's contention was that the trial court did not tolerate the signatures of the plaintiff. But it was decided by the appellate court. The seller's contract for validity did not include the date of his performance and no separate payment payment receipt was reportedly signed by the plaintiff on an unknown contract for sale but the plaintiff was not signed by the plaintiff. His son's signature was available but there was no mention that he was a lawyer or had the option of contracting the sale with his father on behalf of the defendant, so the local commission assessed the value of the suit property. Was. 4,80,000 while the present suit of Rs 22,000 was entered into the contract 10 years after the alleged sale of the contract, only one party to the dubious contract of sale was signed and the same was signed by the Contract Act, 1872. Cannot be called a contract under Section 2 (e) (h) of the Act. The contract will come into force upon approval of the proposal / proposal and there will be agreement. Both parties to the agreement must agree to meet the terms of such agreement for the performance of their performance or their performance in the future and may be eligible to file a specific performance claim on it. Because of the above agreement, when neither of the parties had signed the agreement, the other party could not claim the specific performance of the particular agreement which did not sign the agreement against the party who did not sign the agreement. In the current case, the sale charge was missing. Appellant
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
