Find a Lawyer

ABDUL RASHEED versus KHIZAR HAYAT

Section 12 For the specific performance of the contract for the cancellation of the sale tax, the defendant's contention was that the contract of sale was not signed by a seller and that the sale of the land was legally for sale and grant. The sale dead was registered on. The collector was in favor of the defendant The cancellation of the sale was not within the jurisdiction of the taxpayer while the plaintiff played his role while the defendant was present on record in favor of the attorney-registered power of attorney by the plaintiff. The defendant's existence of a registered contract to sell was not a case was filed against the defendants for the cancellation of such documents. No defect was found in the search of the facts recorded by the courts below. Was deleted

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014

• Mst. MUREED FATIMA v. GUL MUHAMMAD 2014 CLC 1662
• ABDUL RASHEED v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION BAIT MEER HAZAR, DISTRICT MUZAFARGARH 2014 YLR 1663
• RAZIA SULTANA v. State 2014 PCrLJ 1663
• MUHAMMAD IRFAN v. JUDGE FAMILY COURT, TAUNSA SHARIF 2014 MLD 1664
• GHULAM YASIN v. MUHAMMAD NAWAZ 2014 MLD 1676
• ABDUL REHMAN v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary 2014 CLC 1677
• MUHAMMAD ZUBAIR v. State 2014 PCrLJ 1680
• MUHAMMAD IJAZ TAHIR v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2014 CLD 1683

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2014 →

jobs for advocates from Lalamusa lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes