HAJI FATEH KHAN versus THE STATE
Of the nine witnesses examined by the prosecution, Section 304, Part 11/307/34/326, seven were injured continuously, whose presence was revealed when their presence was proven at the relevant time. The cross-examination was that the other party was also injured and a counter-case was registered, in which the central witness named one of the injured witnesses as the accused. And they did not make false statements. There is no enmity between the parties and the witnesses, in which there is no reason to falsely implicate the accused and there is nothing to doubt their evidence and the truth of the story. Detained and subsequently held, prosecution case against the accused proved and conviction and conviction were upheld.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Shangla lawyer
