MUHAMMAD ISHTIAQ versus MUHAMMAD IQBAL
Appeal against the preliminary injunction in the Succession Act 1925 Section 278 Administration Suite Order of Court, which shows that the appellant's counsel had expressed his consent to the initial decree, which claimed that such consent Was given on the condition that it should be in the names of the respondents. Was added, part of the deceased's estate was provided for the construction of the same appellant, other properties were added in the name of other legal heirs who were part of the deceased administrator's estate. Were the ones who submitted their report. The appellant may be aggrieved by the court, in the name of the respondents, who in fact belongs to the deceased; If necessary
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from New Saeedabad lawyer
