Find a Lawyer

PAKISTAN RAILWAYS versus AFTAB AHMED

Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 199 Pakistan Railway Establishment Code, Volume 11, RR 2043 (FR 53) 2044 (FR 54) R 2003 (4) Payment of Wages Act (IV 1936), Section 2 (vi) and 15 Pay The accompanying exemption grant railway employee was suspended from employment as a result of some criminal cases and was subsequently reinstated to full benefits after being honorably discharged and suspended under Rule 2044 of the Code. All salaries for the period were restored and after deducting the amount it is paid as a residual grant during the suspension, the salary balance is paid to the Authority as a payment wage. Under the TA, however, the employee's claim for payment of deductions was allowed, which was retained on the Labor Court Rules 2043 and 2044 of the Railway Establishment Code upon appeal. Do not attempt to negotiate a new contract between the parties, nor was the payment of a grant grant intended to be a consequence of initiating misconduct against the employee or causing the employee to suffer due to this inappropriate action. His analysis of the rules shows no ambiguity and there was no justification for forcing the employee to pay the full salary even though he had already received, half of his suspension period through his employment. During the suspension proceedings, holding, not demanding intervention, petition allowed and defamated order Was terminated and set aside, by the authority to pay the employees full salaries, if not already paid, after deducting payments made during the suspension period under the terms of the Code of Conduct R 2003 Directive to do famous high court advocate from Patika lawyer