MESSRS PAKISTAN STATE OIL COMPANY versus MUHAMMAD HAROON
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 After dismissing employment on corruption charges, the Labor Court after recording the evidence concluded that the respondents dismissed the theft charges against the employees. The order could not be denied and his order was re-instated. The order of service rendered by the Labor Appellate Tribunal in the order of the labor court did not allegedly misrepresent the evidence by the applicant's lawyer, which is primarily a question of appreciating the evidence, the answer was in the jurisdiction of the writ. Did not have to go, but no evidence was misrepresented. Nor was the testimony of the evidence admissible by the tribunals below. No cases of interference were reported
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Chilas lawyer
